fix: codex review
This commit is contained in:
parent
90b253d5ca
commit
d8df68677f
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||
- Highest single-email reply rate: **8.4%** (Belkins).
|
||||
- 4–7 email campaigns achieve **27% reply rates** vs 9% for 1–3 emails (Woodpecker, 20M emails).
|
||||
- By 4th follow-up, response rates drop **55%** and spam complaints **triple**.
|
||||
- Resolution: longer sequences catch different timing windows. Cap at 5 follow-ups max. Each must add genuinely new value.
|
||||
- Resolution: longer sequences catch different timing windows. Cap at 4 follow-ups (5 total emails). Each must add genuinely new value.
|
||||
|
||||
## Optimal Cadence
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,6 +48,6 @@ Data conflicts: Belkins says questions perform well (46% open rate). Lavender sa
|
|||
|
||||
Executives receive 300–400 emails daily, decide in seconds. They respond **23% more often** than non-C-suite when emails pass their filter (6.4% reply rate).
|
||||
|
||||
What works: ultra-concise, human, understated. "{{Name}}, can you help me?" (up to 67% open rate on good lists) · "thank you" · "an update" · "a question" · reference to a specific project.
|
||||
What works: ultra-concise, human, understated. "{{companyInitiative}}" · "thank you" · "an update" · "a question" · reference to a specific project or trigger event.
|
||||
|
||||
Anything "salesy" is immediately rejected.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue